Divorce is already a challenging process. Dividing complex assets can add to the complexity.

In Arizona, a community property state, stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) may be considered marital property. Understanding how to handle these assets can help facilitate a fair settlement.

Understanding stock options and RSUs

Stock options give the employee the right to purchase company stock at a predetermined price, known as the strike price, at a future date. In contrast, RSUs entitle the employee to the cash value of the stock on that date. Both types of stock compensation have vesting schedules, meaning they become fully owned by the employee after a certain period.

Community vs. separate property

Under community property law, both spouses own equal shares of assets acquired during a marriage. If stock options or RSUs were granted during the marriage, they are typically considered community property and subject to division. However, if they were granted before the marriage or as an incentive for future performance, they may be considered separate property.

Valuation and division

Valuing stock options is challenging due to their fluctuating nature. The value is often determined based on the stock’s market price at the time of separation or divorce. Once valued, division options include:

• Buy-out: Employee spouse buys the other spouse’s share at its determined value
• Offset: Non-employee spouse receives other marital assets of equivalent value
• Equal division: Stock options are divided equally between spouses

There is much to consider when dividing complicated marital assets. Having experienced legal guidance can help you ensure that you get a fair settlement.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Driving under the influence (DUI) is a serious offense that can result in license suspension, steep fines, and even jail time. However, being charged with DUI doesn’t automatically mean guilt, and there are several potential defenses that can be raised in court. Here are some of the most common defenses to DUI charges.

The stop was improper 

Police officers cannot stop vehicles arbitrarily; they must have reasonable suspicion that the driver has committed an offense. If there is no evidence of a violation before the stop, any evidence collected afterward may be inadmissible in court.

Reasonable suspicion might include behaviors such as speeding, swerving, running a red light or other erratic driving patterns. Without such evidence, the stop itself can be challenged, which may weaken the prosecution’s case significantly.

Inaccurate tests

To establish intoxication, police officers often rely on field sobriety tests and breathalyzer readings. Field sobriety tests involve physical assessments to measure a driver’s coordination, balance, and cognitive abilities. However, these tests are highly subjective and influenced by factors such as anxiety, medical conditions, or even uneven road surfaces. It’s important to note that these tests are also voluntary, and their results can be disputed in court.

Breathalyzers, while more scientific, are not foolproof. If the device is not properly maintained or calibrated, it can yield inaccurate results. Furthermore, medical conditions like acid reflux or diabetes can lead to elevated blood alcohol content (BAC) readings, creating a false impression of intoxication.

Other potential defenses 

Other defenses may include procedural violations, such as mishandling evidence or failing to read Miranda rights. These errors can undermine the prosecution’s case and potentially lead to a dismissal of charges.

The sooner a strong defense strategy is formed, the better the chances of a favorable outcome. A DUI conviction can have severe personal and professional consequences, so seeking legal guidance is essential.

Posted in Criminal Defense, Divorce, Firm News, Uncategorized | No Comments »

There are many reasons that marriages break down. One that crops up frequently is that the couple have differences in attitudes over money.

Here are a few such differences.

Spenders vs. savers

Should you save for a rainy day or enjoy the present because you never know if today will be your last? The correct answer probably lies somewhere in between. If you lean toward saving, you could easily get frustrated if your spouse appears unable or unwilling to avoid spending most of your income.

Even if you both agree that saving is essential, you might clash over how best to do so. Maybe you prefer to play it safe by investing in a municipal money market account, whereas your spouse would rather take risks and invest in things that could go big quickly, but it could also fail dramatically.

Differences over a commitment to earning

You believe in working as much as possible to earn as much as you can when the going is good. Your spouse has a more relaxed attitude toward work. They don’t feel they should work too hard and rarely work a whole five days. This could lead to friction if you feel you end up paying a larger share of the outgoings or contributing more to your joint financial reserves or if you are never free to do things with them because you are busy trying to earn more.

A resulting lack of trust

You got upset with your spouse when the last big credit card bill came in. You could not understand what led them to make those purchases that you cannot afford. They went off and sulked and as a result began trying to hide some of their spending from you, for fear you will get upset if you find out. On top of that, you have also started hiding some of your spending from them, as you fear they will call you a hypocrite if they find out. Breakdowns of trust like this can severely damage a marriage.

If differences over money have brought your marriage to breaking point, you may want to start learning more about how a divorce works. Getting legal guidance can help.

Posted in Criminal Defense, Divorce, Firm News, Uncategorized | No Comments »

It’s true that when children have the involvement of both parents they do better academically and emotionally. But that’s not always the case.

In some instances, limited exposure to one parent is best for the child’s well-being.

In the best interest of a child

Arizona’s family courts usually lean towards creating a parenting time schedule that gives equal time to both parents, believing that it’s best for the child. Shared parenting responsibility and cooperation give the child access to both parents and more stability.

However, sometimes it’s best for one parent to request primary parenting time. This means that one parent would provide the child’s main residence.

There are several reasons why one parent may seek sole physical custody, including:

• The other parent has a history of substance abuse, domestic violence or neglect and it poses a risk to the child’s safety
• One parent lives far away, making joint custody impractical
• Incarceration of a parent
• The parent is absent or is minimally involved in the child’s life

In order to gain primary parenting time, a parent must file a petition with the Arizona Family Court, which should clearly state the reasons for their request and provide supporting documentation. The court will consider a variety of factors, such as:

• The emotional bond the child has with each parent
• The physical and mental health of the parents and their ability to provide a stable environment for the child
• How well the child is adjusting to home, school and the community
• The child’s preferences (depending on the child’s age and maturity)
• Any history of substance abuse, physical violence or child abuse

After reviewing the circumstances, the court will decide based on the child’s best interests. 

If you are considering requesting primary parenting time of your child, you will want to speak with someone who can guide you through the process. They will work to secure the best outcome for you and your child.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Community property rules mean that spouses generally have to split almost everything they acquire during marriage. Unless they reach a settlement on their own, a judge applies the community property statute after reviewing an inventory of marital assets and debts.

People sometimes assume that they can protect specific resources as their separate property, only to later learn that they are actually part of the marital estate. For example, 401(k) retirement accounts usually have a direct association with one spouse’s employment. They make contributions with each paycheck and may even receive matching amounts from their employers as a job benefit.

Despite ostensibly belonging to one spouse on paper, 401(k)s are usually marital property that are subject to division under community property statutes. If the couple has not yet reached retirement age, the account holder may worry about losing some of their savings to taxes and penalties.

Are such losses inevitable during a divorce?

There are ways to avoid tax consequences and penalties

Technically, any withdrawal from a tax-deferred retirement account could lead to tax consequences. People usually have to report the withdrawal as income. Especially when making a large change, such as removing half of the account balance, the withdrawal of funds before reaching retirement age might result in a much higher income tax obligation for the year.

There can be a penalty that applies as well. The rules for 401(k)s try to prevent people from taking money out of the account before they retire. Any sizeable withdrawal typically results in a 10% penalty based on the amount withdrawn.

Those penalties and tax consequences are not inevitable. In fact, there’s a relatively simple way to avoid them during a divorce. People simply need to have a lawyer draft a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO).

The use of a QDRO allows the professional managing the account to divide it into two separate accounts, each of which receives a specific percentage of the original account value. Provided that both spouses leave the funds in their individual accounts, neither spouse has to worry about taxes or a financial penalty.

While the thought of dividing retirement savings may make people anxious, it is possible to split a 401(k) without incurring further losses due to financial consequences. Learning more about the basic rules for property division in a divorce can help people achieve their goals as they prepare to rebuild their lives afterward.

Posted in Criminal Defense, Divorce, Firm News, Uncategorized | No Comments »

One of the most emotionally charged issues that comes up in a divorce is the tricky problem of dividing a couple’s shared possessions. There are times when it can actually be easier to split major assets – like bank accounts, real estate and cars – than it is to divide the household items.

Most people don’t realize just how emotionally attached they can get to their furniture, artwork and other mementos. Knowing when to fight it out over your possessions and when to let things go, however, is critical.

How should these items be divided?

Arizona is a community property state, which means that all marital property is supposed to be divided 50/50. However, you can’t exactly divide a couch or a painting down the middle.

Ideally, couples will come to some kind of agreement about their household goods. Often, couples choose to divide things according to their interests or needs – such as letting the spouse who likes to cook keep all the kitchen goods while the spouse who gardens keeps all the yard tools. Other items might be divided by “sets,” where one spouse keeps the living room furniture and the other takes the furniture from the bedroom. Smaller items may be split up according to value or by simply taking turns.

If you and your spouse can’t agree, however, fighting it out in court and requiring a judge to decide is just going to add to the time and cost of your divorce. In the end, nobody can decide what’s worth fighting over in a divorce except the people involved. However, having sound legal guidance can help you better determine what’s worth fighting for.

Posted in Criminal Defense, Divorce, Firm News, Uncategorized | No Comments »

If you’re facing marijuana-related charges, such as driving under the influence (DUI), a test may be done to check for the substance in your system. For example, the authorities may ask you to perform a urine test. This will demonstrate if you’ve been using marijuana or not, as it can be difficult to determine if a driver is actively high during the traffic stop itself.

One important thing to note is that marijuana can show up in a urine test for up to 30 days. Whether it shows up depends on the frequency of use. If you used marijuana one time in your life and it was 30 days ago, it should be well out of your system. However, if you have been using it every day for the last five years, then it may show up in a urine test for the next month – even after you stop.

Complicating a DUI

This can really complicate things if you are facing impaired driving charges. Say that you got pulled over driving home from a friend’s house, and the police say you were impaired at the time. You claim that you weren’t high and you didn’t break the law. The police don’t have a breath test reading to rely on as they would during an alcohol-related arrest.

As noted, a urine test does show the presence of marijuana in your system, so the police can claim that shows you were high at the time of the traffic stop. You counter by saying that you hadn’t used any marijuana that day and you certainly weren’t high.

In a situation like this, things can get highly complex and other evidence may need to be examined. It’s very important that you understand all of your legal defense options when facing these charges.

Posted in Criminal Defense, Divorce, Firm News, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Child custody orders in Arizona can be modified, but it requires following a legal process and meeting specific requirements. Whether your circumstances have changed or your child’s needs have evolved. 

Here, you will find helpful information about navigating the legal process when requesting a modification of child custody orders. 

Understand the legal grounds for modification

To request a modification of child custody in Arizona, you must demonstrate a significant change in circumstances. This could include relocation, a change in the child’s needs or a shift in one parent’s ability to care for the child. The court will unlikely approve a modification request without proof of substantial change.

Wait for the appropriate time

Arizona law generally requires parents to wait at least one year before requesting a custody modification unless there are urgent circumstances, such as the child being in immediate danger. If domestic violence or abuse is present, the court may allow a modification without waiting a full year.

File the necessary court documents

To begin the modification process, file a “Petition to Modify Child Custody” with the court that issued the original order. The petition must clearly outline the changes in circumstances and why a new custody arrangement is in the child’s best interest. Arizona courts focus on the child’s well-being when considering any custody changes.

Attend a court hearing

After filing your petition, you’ll attend a court hearing. Both parents can present evidence supporting their case for or against the modification. The judge will review all evidence and testimonies before deciding whether the custody order should be altered.

Navigating custody modifications can be complex. It’s recommended to seek legal guidance to ensure all necessary steps are completed properly and in your child’s best interest.

Posted in Criminal Defense, Divorce, Firm News, Uncategorized | No Comments »

The use of social media can be a risky thing during divorce proceedings. This is because your posts can significantly contribute to the decisions made regarding property division, spousal support, and child custody, among other divorce-related matters.

So, should you deactivate your social media accounts until your divorce is finalized?

Here is what to know:

Can you remain positive?

Being positive can be a challenge when going through a divorce. You may not be on the same page with your soon-to-be ex-spouse concerning certain issues. And this may frustrate you to the point of saying “negative” things to and about them in person and on social media.

That’s why it’s crucial to go to therapy during divorce to learn how to manage your emotions. Accordingly, it can be possible to stay calm and positive when interacting with your spouse.

Leaving negative or untruthful comments on your spouse’s posts or posting your frustrations about the divorce on social media may depict you as bitter or uncooperative. Your spouse’s team can use this to get the upper hand in child custody decisions if you have kids or other issues.

Can you stay private?

Consider changing your privacy settings on social media during your divorce for privacy and peace of mind. Only your close friends should see what you post. You can also ask your friends not to tag you in their posts.

Despite doing this, you still need to be cautious about what you post or the activities you participate in when in social settings, with cameras all over. Your post or an incriminating photo can easily reach your spouse.

If possible, you can avoid social media altogether during divorce. But if you can’t, be careful about how you use it. Learn more about this and other aspects that can disadvantage you during your divorce.

Posted in Criminal Defense, Divorce, Firm News, Uncategorized | No Comments »

If you’re like a lot of Arizonans who are considering divorce, you may think you have a pretty clear idea of what separate property is and what marital property is. That may be true.

Separate property typically includes any property you had before you got married (like a car or a condo, for example). It may also include any inheritances or gifts that were given only to you and not to you and your spouse jointly, even if you received assets during your marriage.

If you kept those assets separate from any marital assets throughout the marriage, your spouse shouldn’t be able to demand a portion of them under Arizona’s community property asset division model. However, challenges may arise if separate assets have become commingled with marital assets.

How commingling happens

Commingling can happen all too easily. It may even be necessary or at least convenient at a specific time. Say you decide to rent out your old condo. You use your joint credit card or bank account to pay for upgrades and repairs. That may make sense. But, that’s no longer going to be considered a separate asset as a result of your efforts. Or maybe you deposited your inheritance in a jointly owned investment account. Those funds are now commingled with marital assets.

Commingling assets is simply what married couples typically do. Oftentimes, it’s for the family’s benefit. You might have used the dividends you earned from those additional investment funds to pay for your child’s college education, for example.

If your marriage ends in divorce, you need to be prepared to share commingled assets with your spouse – and vice versa. The most practical way to avoid that is to have a prenuptial or even a postnuptial agreement stating that any separate assets brought into the marriage and any inheritances and gifts are not part of the marital estate to be divided.

There are different degrees of commingling, of course. For example, maybe you kept that condo just to use as an informal office where you could work in peace. If your spouse’s contribution to it has been the use of a joint credit card to pay for new carpeting, that likely doesn’t mean that they’ll be entitled to half the value of the condo during your divorce.

Negotiating asset and debt division during divorce can be a complicated endeavor – even in community property states. It’s crucial to understand how the law works and how to protect your right to a fair settlement. Getting experienced guidance is a wise first step.

Posted in Criminal Defense, Divorce, Firm News, Uncategorized | No Comments »